In the federal and commercial contracting space, winning a bid can quickly become a small business's first major financial crisis. Shikigami Contract Intelligence (Themis) is a contract intelligence platform being engineered to protect small businesses before and after they pursue a government or commercial contract.
By unifying contract technical analysis, dynamic capability evaluation, financial cash-survival modeling, and post-award execution planning, Themis is designed to answer the central operational question: Can this company afford to bid, win, and execute this contract without losing money, missing deadlines, or putting the business at risk? Themis is not being built to simply generate AI contract summaries; the goal is a deterministic execution blueprint that safeguards contractors from underpriced bids and unfinanceable obligations.
A solicitation may initially appear profitable when a contractor prices the visible scope, but hidden requirements — such as buried FAR/DFARS clauses, unstated security clearances, customer dependencies, and required software dependencies — frequently create significant, unbudgeted expenses.
Furthermore, a contract can be profitable on paper but impossible to finance in reality. Contractors must float payroll, software licenses, equipment, and subcontractor costs while awaiting system access, formal customer acceptance, and final payment. If a company lacks sufficient working capital or a safe cash gap, it can default on an otherwise profitable contract. A single missed milestone eliminates expected profit, damages the vendor's past-performance record, and threatens the survival of a small business lacking dedicated legal, financial, and compliance departments.
Themis is being designed to evaluate the reality of the contract and the reality of the company simultaneously, through a controlled opportunity lifecycle — from secure document submission and mapping to personalized bid recommendations and post-award execution planning.
The Document-Processing Pipeline (planned)
To reduce the hallucination risks associated with generative AI, Themis separates its processing pipeline into distinct evidence, rules, AI reasoning, and financial calculation layers:
Adaptive Profiling and The Decision Engine (planned)
Instead of forcing users to complete generic forms, Themis is designed to generate an adaptive questionnaire based on the specific contract requirements and the contractor's saved permanent company profile.
The Decision Engine is designed to process these inputs into a transparent, weighted viability score:
The design enforces "hard stops" (e.g., an unfinanceable cash-flow gap or a missing mandatory certification) that override numerical scores, producing one of five personalized recommendations: Strong Bid, Bid With Conditions, Team or Subcontract, Needs Information, or Do Not Bid.
Because pre-bid government solicitations and proprietary financial models frequently contain Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), Themis is being architected with the Department of Defense's Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) framework and NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 requirements as design targets.
The platform's roadmap includes three deployment tiers, planned to address different customer security postures:
As the platform matures toward these deployment tiers, the design calls for FIPS-validated cryptography for data at rest and in transit, multi-factor authentication, and role-based access controls, with the goal of aligning with CMMC Level 2 requirements ahead of applicable enforcement timelines.
No deployment tier, cryptographic module, or compliance framework described in this section has been formally assessed, certified, or independently audited as of this writing. This section describes the architecture Themis is being built toward, not a current compliance status.
The intended value of Themis extends beyond the bid phase. The design calls for original bid assumptions to convert into active execution controls the moment a contractor wins an award.
Themis is designed to support bid/no-bid and capture decisions. It does not provide legal, accounting, or contracting advice, and its outputs do not replace the professional judgment of qualified counsel, accountants, or contracting officers.